I didn't try a brake because of the hap-hazard way things are put together. I couldn't really see a decent way to operate it, and sync it with the bike brakes. No hydraulic rear. Plus I rode the car without, and it didn't seem too bad at stopping. Honestly, if I get a good sidecar, I would definitely get a brake. I would most like go with DMC, as well. My parts sourcing came from Tractor Supply, and they do have hubs with brakes available. I am also planning on reinforcing the frame some. I don't think the Shadow is too far off for the size of car, but I agree I wouldn't go much bigger. I guess my thing is finding out if I like hacks before I put too much money into a good one. 'Finding out' for me generally means I tear it apart, until I get the squeaky out of the dog toy, and see what makes it squeak. Sure, someone with a lot of experience could do it better and faster, but I will know all about it when I'm done. Not all about every sidecar, but all about the one I have. Then I will know exactly what to look for when I get a good one. Oddly enough, I've pretty much already made up my mind which company I'm probably going to use if I do, which is usually the last step for me. Then again, there just isn't a lot of them around. Someone like Jay helping out goes a long way with customer relations, even before they become a customer. 🙂 (Not that he's the only one, though, there's a lot of very helpful people on this site.)
I dunno Jay, there's a lot more people on here that have done that conversion than I had thought. A lot being in the area of 6, though, I guess it depends on what you decide is a good market. I think a Velorex with a 15mm axle is unsafe, and everyone should do something. You can get a 20mm axle from someplace, but I'm still not sure that's robust enough. The 25mm seems like your preference, I went big, I figured I need more weight anyhow. The 20mm IMO I would think about upgrading it, that 15 really didn't do much to hold up anything. I suspect the guy I bought it from curbed it without telling me and it was fatigued already, though. Not that putting a large friend of mine in the tub helped, he exceeded the rated capacity by close to double. (And yes he still fit lol)
Sorry this was so long.
Jeff
I really want to see this rig when you are done.
Keep us posted.
Mike In MS
No problem! I was thinking of maybe writing it up for the magazine. One of the big paragraphs is going to be a thank you to everyone who helped, you, Jay, lots of great people on this site! 😀
Swing arm with axle went in the mail today.
Mike
🙂 Thank you!
BTW Spartan by me is selling new Enfields with Cozy Rockets attached. Not sure what a G5 Deluxe is, but they are an Enfield dealer now, and install & sell sidecars. I guess that makes them a sidecar dealer, too? 🙂
Update:
I sort of finished my project. Got it all aligned, took it for a test ride. It rode nicely, took it up to 60mph. A tiny bit of wobble at one time when I was trying hard to see if it had one, but nothing you'd likely ever see.
Then I took it to a parking lot and really pushed it hard. The big trailer tire probably had 3x the traction it used to have. Trying to skid the car in a left hander, I put so much torque on... I bent the mounts. Probably slipped the frame clamps, too, but not sure about that yet.
Made it home on the shoulder, back corner of the car frame about 1 1/2" from the pavement. Sigh. My modification was great, it rode well, and was much sturdier than the rest of the car... Do I need to reinforce everything? Lol I guess as long as I don't try to full throttle a left hander, I'll probably be all right.
Conclusion: buy a complete setup with the right mounts from someone who knows what they're doing. Although I am going to re-align and tighten everything and see what happens, anyhow, in spite of my own advice. I think the fact that it's bent can be compensated for, I'm more worried that it CAN bend. (And that it is already, with metal fatigue in mind.)
Wow! You should become a "warranty tester". But if I read the post correctly, the parts you beefed-up held-up, and the parts that Jay said are questionable failed. With this information I could zero in on exactly what I need to modify on my Velorex. It appears I am going to have it for a long time. Interest in older used rigs is really low.
Thanks for posting the progress and the pictures.
Later, Bud...
that in deed was a BIT scary....Once upon the time I had to take off my Velorex sidecar from the Jawa for to be able to cross a hanging bridge over a too deep river.(had been washed down in my first attempt) On the other side I had to reassemble... although I didn't change any adjustment, there was no way to get it set up working decently. Next day at a gas station I jacked the rig up on the middle tube of the frame....the movement without even loosening the clamps was impressive. For the rest of the trip tracking was NASTY. Ever since I left the Jawa rig to be set up by the CR-importer Fernando Sanabria who always did a excellent job.
Your case is another proof that reasonable relations between bike and sidecar shall be obeyed.
Sven
Yeah, bud. I think unscrewing the adjustment so there was a lot of thread was probably the last straw. The threaded rods are obviously thinner than the threaded tubes they go inside of, and it would be wise to keep them as short as possible. I probably have 6" to 8" of (now curved) thread showing on the one link.
Also, I'm not real sure I like the shims that go under the pointy eye bolts on the frame. The points fit into a detente on the shim. I didn't put them in on the first go-round, and nothing slipped- but the point of the screw all but pierced the frame, so I put them in this time, and think things slip much easier. Thinking of tack welding them to the frame, still not sure about that, it makes it pretty much set, but a small weld could be broken loose... At which point why bother?
Sven- yeah, it's strange. I see why it's not recommended to take the sidecar off and run solo. It never goes back on exactly the same, No matter how careful you are. Maybe if I had a real rig instead of my modified toy, I dunno. I don't see me getting a lot done on it this month. Had a chance today, and played hooky and went for a ride with my daughter instead, then I'm going to be tied up with our Guinness world record attempt, and flat track races. Maybe July.
You should be lucky about that the twist happened while trying on a parking lot....imagine in a rough riding situation.
(Like I had in Anchorage in 2013....or the blind lady or the taxi would have taken me home as dash figure. The Ural made it with only 3 broken spokes.)
Safety first!
Is still my motto and will stay it.
Sven
Exactly why I was in a parking lot, pushing it as hard as I could. ? I've figured out some things to mitigate this, and hopefully come out all right without a lot of extensive modifications. Mostly realigning things and shortening the threaded rod sticking out. Unfortunately, having to realign things with one mount welded, means I need to adjust the mounting clamp and all of the other mounts. Oh well, it'll just take time. I got the one mostly moved, another rough positioned, I do the PitA one next. I learned the first time, do the hard one and lock it down, then align the easy ones.
Sure am glad I made that sidecar cart, though. Thought I'd only use it the one time, and it was probably worth it- but twice, very worth it.
Sorry to have to say it,Jeff.
on this photo it becomes obvious where are your main mistakes:
1) You found out the hard way... you need to have a short thread on the back strut.
2) You only mount in the front with the 2 lower mounts WAY too narrow together. You need some solid lower mount in the back, means a beefy subframe on the bike that gives you support where you need it and brings the force evenly into the bike frame.
At this moment you work with 4 points that are as efective as 3 in a really poor arrangement with way too long levers on too narrow pivots. You were lucky to have got that far.
There is no way to cheat physics. Or you learn to apply it well or somewhen the above will tell you "game over".
Excuse me if that sounds harsh, but you need to know what you do. You do not only put into danger yourself, but others too. At this point I am about to say you are better off by writing off your project on the account experience and get a used rig made up by a professional. There are still tons of personalisations to do for to satisfy your tinker instinct, but then you get a safe base.
Says someone who usually has to clean up the damages others did to their machinery.
Sven
It's all good Sven, I appreciate the advice.
I know the lower mounts are pretty close together. It was a decision to trial knowing I probably need a sub frame with a further back mount. At that point, I'll probably just leave the one and make it a 5 point mount. However, having survived the 70mph trip up the embankment without moving a millimeter, this might be good enough. Testing will see, but the mounts being close has not been the cause of my headaches (yet). I am aware that it is not ideal, though.
The back strut is not where it bent, actually. The forces there are pretty straight along the center line. It bent at the front mount, where I manufactured an angled arm. It makes sense now, but I didn't think about the forces being at a vector to the rod, instead of along it. (If the two sides of the angled arm make 2/3 of a triangle, forces will be along the invisible third side of the triangle.) This tends toward bending that arm even more, but my modifications were much too strong, it bent at the original, weaker, rod.
Jeff, that is what I meant. something will give. and that uses to be the weakest point... Had it with my 1960 Willys the same way... nice strong sheet metal all around. I fool did not beef up where the factory "saved material" and built a "Sollbruchstelle" - "breaking point by design" at the engine support, body supports and gearbox.
We cannot cheat physics and have to adjust accourdingly. Without seeing Your rig in person I do not dare to give more comments, but think about to build a decent subframe and eventually design a logical well "triangled" sidecar frame. Remember there must be some place "to give" and maintain a certain flexibility. When in motocross somebody came up with single piece welded/soldered solid rig frames practically all those broke earlier or later. Find the right solution in medium where solid frame and flexibible springiness get to a healthy equilibrium.
One man in Herzberg, Harz mountains, Germany once used 2 1/2 years until he found out the perfect axle design for his "Superelastic" (MZ) sidecar. => That thing was fascinating. As more load he put into the rig, the drag would always get compensated by the tilting of the sidecar wheel and changeing of the toe in. Plus when breaking the pushed sidecar swing would stay level. Neither dive in nor push up but still have good suspension.
"With patience and a club you even get the green ones down."
Costarrican saying which used to be my mother in law's motto.
Good luck.
Sven
Thanks. I've given up on my current mounts, I decided I need that further back lower mount no matter what, just as you are saying and I was trying hard to cheat. To do that on this bike with a swing arm, I need a sub frame. I am not making one. At least not this year. Anyone want to buy a Velorex with a very robust suspension?
- 29 Forums
- 11.5 K Topics
- 88 K Posts
- 3 Online
- 5,365 Members