Skip to content
One persons belief ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

One persons belief that airhead BMW's should not be used for sidecars

21 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
849 Views
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I have had a BMW R75/6 rig with a velorex sidecar. It had a dauntless subframe. You do ned a subrame and a good steering damper, but a well sorted out airhead rig is excellent. I rode mine for two years and the new owner is probably enjoying it as we speak.

My daughter got older and wanted a new rig. Since I just bop around, I found an old Ural that needed some serious work. Now that I have it well sorted out, I can tell you (and its blasphemy cause I'm a lifelong BMW rider) yes, the Ural is way better for pulling a chair. They don't go fast (big deal) but I way prefer the leading link suspension and dedicated mounts.

But an airhead final drive? Cmon, anybody who says what this guy is saying just plain doesn't know anything about motorcycles. I will take half the fluid out of an airhead drive, attach a Ural and chair on a chain and drag it halfway across the state on flat tires. What a joke. There has never been a finer and stronger drivetrain made for a motorcycle ever.

Yes, airhead brakes totally stink for pulling a chair... but so do any other manufacturers 1970's brakes. If I were doing another airhead rig, I would buy an Earle's fork bike from the 60's that already has sidecar attachment points.

But I'm very pleased with my ural for my own needs and I do like it all overall more than my airhead rig. WHen stuff starts going wrong with the bike thoug, I'm going to miss that airhead reliability.

Attached files


 
Posted : July 26, 2011 9:33 am
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

Here's my BMW rig, you can see why I like the Ural more. Way nicer chair and appointment for way less money

Attached files


 
Posted : July 26, 2011 9:42 am
(@swampfox)
Posts: 1932
Moderator
 

Brownw3 - 7/26/2011 2:33 PM

... the Ural is way better for pulling a chair [than an Airhead]....

Interesting comments Brown, as I've had conversations with a former Airhead rig owner now Ural rig owner that said the same thing: The Airhead is a better bike, but the Ural (frame, leading links, etc.) is a much better sidecar tug, adding that the Ural would be great if had an R90 engine w/5 speed transmission w/reverse.


Lee
MB5+TW200+CRF250L+GTV300+INT650
XL883R w/Texas Ranger Sidecar
Zuma 50F + Burgman w/Texas Sidecar<Mrs. SwampFox

 
Posted : July 26, 2011 2:52 pm
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
 

I'll even get crazier. My Ural is a 1998. It's a 650. I'm a big guy and my daughter is only 9 but a shade under 5'4" . The Ural is childs' play to work on, and pulls us around tracking straight as an arrow at 55 MPH. Does anybody need more than that?

Maybe they do, but I don't. Now My BMW rig was super, but the chair was a joke. I have a $4000 price limit for a second bike (my daily rider is an R1200GS BMW) My Ural Rig, as pictured, I have a total of $3000 in it and that includes the license plates! ANd it looks way cooler and more retro.

I have 4 speeds and reverse, and that's plenty for safely toting my girl around


 
Posted : July 26, 2011 7:15 pm
(@horrorguy)
Posts: 285
Reputable Member
 

if people hadnt been running sidecars on BMWs for many years i may pay more attention to the opinion. if i got a second sidecar an old BMW with a sidecar would be a choice .


 
Posted : August 7, 2011 4:18 pm
(@horrorguy)
Posts: 285
Reputable Member
 

dead sidecarists,sadly we know the answer to that.inexperence and lack of training ,improperly set up sidecars [poor handling] and people in cars running us over.i think in the motorcycle family exploding rear drives would be a topic talked about even by old life long harley riders like myself if they were killing riders.


 
Posted : August 8, 2011 2:38 am
Page 2 / 2